Background: Services employing staff to support people with disability usually provide training in a range of areas including communication and managing challenging behaviour. Given that such training can be costly and time-consuming, it is important to evaluate the evidence presented in support of such programs. Efficacy in clinical practice is measured using evidence-based practice. However, there is currently no model that is widely used to compare and evaluate training programs despite the large number of training programs reported each year.
Method: Six studies published in the last decade that reported the outcomes of communication-based training and six that reported on the outcomes of challenging behaviour training were evaluated using the 4-level Kirkpatrick model.
Results: Comparison of the levels of evidence is made for these 12 studies.
Conclusion: The Kirkpatrick model provides one technique for appraisal of the evidence for any reported training program and could be used to evaluate whether a training program is likely to meet the needs and requirements of both the organisation implementing the training and the staff who will participate.
Campbell M. Campbell M. J Intellect Disabil. 2007 Jun;11(2):143-56. doi: 10.1177/1744629507076928. J Intellect Disabil. 2007. PMID: 17613590 Review.
Randell E, Hastings RP, McNamara R, Knight R, Gillespie D, Taylor Z. Randell E, et al. Trials. 2017 Oct 5;18(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2175-1. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28982380 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Gueguen JA, Bylund CL, Brown RF, Levin TT, Kissane DW. Gueguen JA, et al. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Jun;7(2):171-9. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509000224. Palliat Support Care. 2009. PMID: 19538799
Koritsas S, Iacono T, Hamilton D, Leighton D. Koritsas S, et al. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep;33(3):247-56. doi: 10.1080/13668250802282944. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008. PMID: 18752097
McCabe MP, Davison TE, George K. McCabe MP, et al. Aging Ment Health. 2007 Sep;11(5):505-19. doi: 10.1080/13607860601086405. Aging Ment Health. 2007. PMID: 17882588 Review.
Griffiths R, Tai S, Sutton C, Camacho E, Dixon J, Palmier-Claus J, Jones A, Welsh N, Ormrod S, Krishan A, Dawber A, Lovell K. Griffiths R, et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Aug 31;10(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01529-w. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024. PMID: 39217388 Free PMC article.
Raffing R, Konge L, Tønnesen H. Raffing R, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):927. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05915-z. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39187817 Free PMC article.
Thomae AV, Witt CM, Barth J. Thomae AV, et al. JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Aug 22;10:e50545. doi: 10.2196/50545. JMIR Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39177012 Free PMC article.
Mikkonen K, Helminen EE, Saarni SI, Saarni SE. Mikkonen K, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 29;26:e54473. doi: 10.2196/54473. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39073862 Free PMC article. Review.
Nguyen BT, Nguyen VA, Blizzard CL, Palmer A, Nguyen HT, Quyet TC, Tran V, Skinner M, Perndt H, Nelson MR. Nguyen BT, et al. JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jul 23;10:e47127. doi: 10.2196/47127. JMIR Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39039926 Free PMC article.